伪娘
What's Really Behind US Defense Firm's Botched Deal to Acquire Pegasus Spyware Maker?_我的网站

一 | "American defense and intelligence contractors like L3Harris want to make money, and there is a market for spyware, domestically and globally," explains retired US Air Force Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, a former analyst for the US Department of Defense. "With the NSO Group sanctioned by the USG for surveillance abuse against Americans and others, buying the Israeli company, its codes, software and tools, and hiring its people directly is a way to get that access (and in theory removing it from the sanction list by incorporating it under a different US company entity).",The controversial negotiations between NSO and L3Harris were jointly reported by the Guardian, the Washington Post and Haaretz on June 14. At the time, The Guardian quoted a senior White House official as saying: "Such a transaction, if it were to take place, raises serious counterintelligence and security concerns for the US government.",The US Commerce Department blacklisted Israeli firm NSO Group in November 2021 for providing spyware called Pegasus to foreign governments that "used these tools to maliciously target" journalists, embassy workers and activists. According to the Biden administration, NSO acted "contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States.",Israeli Police Chief Orders Creation of Commission to Investigate Pegasus Spyware Scandal7 February, 14:16 GMT,"Pegasus is a 'zero-click' hacking tool that can remotely extract everything from a target’s mobile phone, including messages, contacts, photos and videos without the user having to click on a phishing link to give it remote access," wrote The New York Times, adding that the Israeli wonder-tool could also turn the target's mobile phone "into a tracking and recording device.",Nonetheless, L3Harris kicked off covert talks with NSO, claiming that US intelligence officials quietly supported its plans to purchase the firm's core spyware technology as well as a possible transfer of NSO personnel to the American defense contractor. What’s more, NSO's technology has long been "of intense interest" to the FBI and the CIA, according to NYT.,Thus, in March 2022, FBI Director Christopher Wray testified to Congress that the agency had bought NSO's spyware Pegasus, claiming that the agency acquired the tool for evaluation but did not use it.,"The FBI has not and did not use the NSO products operationally in any investigation," Wray told the lawmakers. "I can confirm that we bought a limited license for testing and investigation. We routinely evaluate technologies that are out there: what are the security concerns raised by those products?",Top Polish Politician Admits Country Bought Israeli Pegasus Spyware7 January, 11:30 GMT,The L3Harris-NSO negotiations continued in secret until June 2022, when the US and Israeli mainstream press leaked information about the possible sale, prompting a storm of criticism from the White House. According to The Guardian, Washington denied that the US intelligence community had ever been "supportive" of the deal. However, this possibility cannot be ruled out, according to Kwiatkowski.,"The outcry of US citizenry and media about illegal and harmful surveillance by the NSO group drove the Biden sanctions; Intel community bureaucrats and their contractors have very different interests, they want to use the most capable (and cost effective) software surveillance and tracking tools out there," she explains.,Kwiatkowski has no doubts that if NSO hacking technology were acquired, it would have been used on American citizens. Furthermore, she does not rule out that "it is already being used, much as before sanctions, and the purchase is in part designed to ensure its use can continue and be expanded.",According to Kwiatkowski, "if left only to lawyers and politicians, this purchase in some form… would proceed and happen, and ultimately serve as a relief from existing sanctions for several aspects of NSO Group's products and services.",Apparently, the "hypocritical and self-serving" deal was slowed down and stopped due to the fact that it was widely publicized, according to the former Pentagon analyst.,Report: US Intel Operatives Backed Plans to Buy Infamous NSO Group Before Negotiations Were Axed11 July, 01:26 GMT,Meanwhile, NSO Group is said to be involved in a broad campaign in the United States to get off Washington's blacklist, according to ProPublica nonprofit newsroom and Shomrim, an Israel-based nonpartisan news organization.,"NSO has invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in the past year in payments to lobbyists, public relations companies and law firms in the US, in the hope of reversing the Biden administration’s November decision, according to public records filed under the Foreign Agent Registration Act and conversations with people familiar with the effort," ProPublica and Shomrim reported on 12 July.,Moreover, NSO is currently trying to get the matter raised during a meeting between US President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid, according to the news organizations.,"So far, the lobbying campaign has generated little response," the report said. "NSO has not been told what it needs to do to remove itself from the list, according to the people familiar with the campaign."。

二 | 这是他第七次和申花的帅位产生联系。2023年底,他刚带队捧起足协杯冠军、直通亚冠,转头就被解约;如今球队坠入低谷,俱乐部第一时间想到的还是这位"自己人"。舆论看好他的理由很简单。其一,零适应期。

三 | 他比谁都懂申花的人、申花的文化、申花的更衣室,上任第一天就能排兵布阵,不必像外教那样花两个月学语言、摸脾气。其二,战术务实,适配保级。申花现在中卫伤得七零八落、进攻端外援状态成谜,吴金贵擅长的稳守反击,恰恰是残阵保级最需要的打法——先别想着压着打,把坑填上、把分拿到。其三,杯赛基因。他拿过足协杯,说明双线作战有过成功先例,俱乐部想兼顾保级和杯赛,他是少数两边都踩过点的人。其四,情怀牌。功勋回归,焦虑的球迷至少先吃一颗定心丸。但"呼声高"不等于"最合适"。吴金贵的短板同样刺眼:进攻偏保守、反击套路相对单一,边路创造力调动一般——而申花这套班底,马纳法、陈晋一的速度天赋本被寄予厚望,交给他未必能最大化。更关键的是,他本质是"救火队长",擅长稳住局面,却难做体系重建。当年足协杯靠的是经验堆出的临场,不是一套能打三年的框架。如今申花的根病在阵容单薄、青训断档、医疗体能短板和管理层迟缓——这些,吴金贵一个人改不了。横向一比更清楚。谢晖,保级经验丰富、曾效力申花、沟通成本低,但他招牌的高位逼抢,和申花现在这批老腿、被伤病掏空的阵容几乎南辕北辙。于汉超,名宿救火,更衣室凝聚力强、球员服气,但从未独立执教,更像"稳住更衣室"的过渡。一排下来,吴金贵的"务实+零成本+杯赛基因",在当下这个节骨眼,确实是最低风险的选项。不过,无论谁来,都得先翻过三座大山。第一座是保级压力:19分仅领先4分,任何一次失误都可能把球队推进降级区。

四 | 第二座是阵容的结构性短缺:缺乏正牌中锋,6名外援4个是前锋却效率堪忧,中卫深度几乎归零,核心中卫线全员伤停,多名主力外援长期休战——新帅得在没人可用里变出人用。第三座最要命,是管理环境。

五 | 斯卢茨基那句"有些事我没办法改变",潜台词是引援话语权、医疗条件、决策节奏都受制约。新帅到任后,能不能拿到比前任更大的自主权,仍是未知数。所以,如果问"谁最适合此刻的申花",吴金贵大概率就是答案——但他不是"最优解",而是"最稳解"。申花现在最怕的不是打得不好看,而是继续滑进降级区。一个上任当天就能排阵、先把防守立起来、让球迷先安心的人,比一个需要半年磨合的"理想型"更有价值。

六 | 尤其足协杯这条线,吴金贵的杯赛经验,可能是申花这赛季唯一的慰藉。不过,别把吴金贵当灵丹妙药。

七 | 申花这几年的剧本太熟了——外教带来体系、成绩起伏、换人、功勋救火、短暂回血、再滑坡。若这次又是"吴金贵上来稳一稳,长远明年再说",不过是把问题往后推。真正的止血,是借换帅把医疗组、体能组、青训造血和引援话语权一并理顺。吴金贵可以是最好的过渡舵手,但船往哪开,得俱乐部自己想清楚。所以,吴金贵是不是最佳人选?我的答案:他是此刻申花最现实、最稳妥的那个人,但"最佳"二字得加上期限——仅限于保级这一战。

八 |
Current article:http://www.bianhajieleigoukusunmen.pics/news/20260826_174.ppt
Published on:11:42:49
